Drawing Conclusions - the Rise of Drawing in the Contemporary Art Scene

Not so long ago, drawing became the new painting.the '90s, fused painting with drawing in a myriad of
From small-scale and intimate to wall-sized,complex mark-making, while Canada's Royal Art
highly-worked or resolutely low-fi; whatever its format,Lodge, formed in 1996, produced whimsical drawings,
the re-appearance of a once side-lined mediumpaintings and objects reminiscent of the Mission
marked a dramatic shift in its fortunes and indeed,School's output.
assumptions about art in general.In Europe, similar trends were also underway. As the
But why the change? Was it that, in an art scene20th century drew to its close, Sweden's Jockum
increasingly driven by fads, drawing became du jourNordstrüm was gaining recognition for his beautifully
simply because it hadn't been for a very long time? Orrendered, twisted tableaux of far from ordinary life.
were other, less obvious factors at work?Switzerland's Marc Bauer produced vigorous drawings
In fact, the re-emergence of drawing was far fromthat exemplified the medium's strength, and in Britain
market-driven, and its increase in profile a far slowerthe hand-drawn zine was adopted by Olivia Plender,
process than any newly voguish status might suggest.albeit in a highly polished form.
To understand something of its current impact, it'sWhile drawing, obviously, had never disappeared
necessary to look back at the closing years of theentirely from the gallery, these artists represent just a
20th century. A time when, to the eyes of many, thefew of those contributing to its rapidly growing visibility
art scene looked very different indeed.towards the end of the '90s. A resurgence now so
Throughout much of the 1990s visual austerity and aevident that, though prompted by certain definable
certain restraint governed the work of a new wave offactors, it nevertheless seems organic, almost
artists; many of them British, many high-profile.essential; a phenomenon that quite possibly identifies
Figures such as Darren Almond, Damien Hirst, Martinas well as answers very current needs amongst
Creed, Rachel Whiteread and a re-discovered Allantoday's young artists.
McCollum typified an art scene driven by hands-off,And what are they?
conceptual practice and stringent theoretical undertow.Well to start with, drawing is cheap. For those
Even artists whose work, by contrast, seemed morestruggling with the high costs of studio space and
ludic and theatrical - Maurizio Catellan, the Chapmanmaterials, it's a medium that's financially viable as well
brothers, an ever-enduring Jeff Koons - shared a tasteas a manageable means of production.
for slick, expensive, mechanized output. And in fact,What's more, it's hugely inclusive. Everyone, at some
looking back, there's a certain synchronistic poetry topoint, has experienced the act of drawing at some
the fact that Marc Quinn's 'Self' portrait, a principal iconlevel, a participation which affords even the most
of the era, quite literally froze the blood.casual observer a sense of involvement in the
Further tendencies underpinned the general sense ofmedium; a visceral engagement in its use that
pristine, chilly surface. Graphic design in the late 90sconceptual art forms often lack.
exulted in the hard edges of its newly perfect digitalYet despite this refreshingly egalitarian glow, it also
genesis, while on a popular level, serious flirtation withappears that much of today's output seems directed
'minimalism' induced homeowners to replace comforttowards highly individual, even arcane expression, a
with pristine surface and spacious void.practice exemplified by intricate, almost obsessive
Clearly, any attempt to rapidly define a moment in artmark-making.
history is doomed to over-simplification. A vast arrayOn the one hand, this wholly supports an ethos by
of artists stand in lush counterpoint to Hirst's surgicallywhich today's artists seem to demand an intimate,
steely cabinets or Whiteread's pale, negative spaces.personal and evident engagement with their art.
The work of Peter Doig, Marlene Dumas, DanielPainstaking detail and labor-intensive mark-making
Richter and Jörg Immendorf - to name just a few -represent artistic endeavor for which the artist alone is
all manifest an obvious delight in exuberantresponsible. No third-party construction teams, no
mark-making or absorbed, painterly gesture.assistants on hand to dab a brush as directed. This art
Yet it's certainly true that what generally made theis about making in the purest possible sense.
headlines - the dissected sheep, the on/off lights, theA parallel explosion in use of craft elements - beading,
unmade beds - were essentially 'conceptual' worksglittering, collage, embroidery - as well as the growing
that side-lined direct artistic intervention. And it's alsopopularity of zines and artists' books - mirrors this
true that, with the internet truly coming of age in thequest for hands-on, highly personalized involvement.
'90s, such highly publicized aesthetics became instantlyYet more intriguingly, demands for creative ownership
and widely accessible for the first time in any history. Inmay well serve needs besides a revision of artistic
the mass public eye, art had gained a hard, new edge.involvement.
Yet elsewhere, a wildly contrasting vision was beingArt, of course, has always been about reflecting and
far less well documented. On America's West Coast,interpreting the world, but the early 21st century seems
in particular, the long-gestating seeds of a brimmingto have experienced a particularly profound
alternative scene were beginning to bear considerablere-appraisal of exactly what the world involves. The
fruit. Its influences were multiple and diverse, yetoutlook is an uneasy one, marked by a growing sense
shared the fact that all lay well outside theof schism and dislocation, and in particular, the notion of
contemporary mainstream.circumstance veering out of control.
In LA, for example, the 'underground' drawings of RayTo return briefly to Pop Surrealism, true to its 'surrealist'
Pettibon - linked initially to the rock scene thenlabel the movement is marked by subversion of
distributed through short-run zines - had garneredapparent reality. Typically, this takes on disturbing,
fervent admirers throughout the late '70s & '80s. Aanxiety-ridden form; bio-morphed figures inhabit
major exhibition in 1992 succeeded in raising his profilescenarios laden with threat; an undertow of violence is
both throughout the States and abroad.darkly enhanced by imagery plucked from childhood.
Yet Pettibon's work was merely the best-known facetAnd importantly, unlike Surrealism, which investigates
of a burgeoning counter-culture. One which, since 1986,the interior spaces of the human psyche, Pop
had found a major advocate in the now legendary LaSurrealism obliquely focuses on physical, actual realities.
Luz De Jesus gallery in downtown LA.Those genetic hybrids, ruined landscapes and constant
This space, located incongruously above an offbeatsimmer of threat don't merely exist in our nightmares.
gift store, focused entirely on artists whoseThey're with us now.
backgrounds and influences sprang from an array ofThe movement itself may have had its day as far as
popular cultures such as illustration, folk art, comics andthe art market is concerned, but the zeitgeist it
tattooing. And this output, crucially, tended towards anportrays is clearly here to stay.
intricate figurative craftsmanship more closelyConsider, for a moment, Jean Dubuffet's famous
associated at the time with illustration than so-calleddescription of L'Art Brut
'fine' art."Those works created from solitude and from pure
The gallery and its stable of artists proved a speedyand authentic creative impulses - where the worries of
and influential local success, and in 1994, Juxtapoz, acompetition, acclaim and social promotion do not
magazine founded by Robert Williams (himself an artistinterfere - are, because of these very facts, more
and friend of famed underground artist Robert Crumb)precious than the productions of professions. ... we
also began to showcase this growing wave ofcannot avoid the feeling that in relation to these works,
alternative art.cultural art in its entirety appears to be the game of a
Utterly at odds with the rarefied, theory-led aestheticfutile society, a fallacious parade."
dominating contemporary practice at the time, this newThough written in the 1950s, the proclamation reads
sensibility came to be regarded as a movement. Itsnow like a perfect manifesto for the kind of
roots and position were defined by not just one label,anti-establishment art scene we've been discussing.
but two: Low-Brow, or Pop Surrealism.Yet quite apart from epitomizing a 'purer' alternative to
Resolutely populist - bordering, even, on kitsch - itsthe mainstream, the kind of art Dubuffet describes
appropriation of popular style and content within a finenow carries connotations far beyond those of his
art context questioned long-held assumptions regardingoriginal assessment.
the parameters of art itself. Revisiting the earliestThe 'simplicity' of naïve or folk art harks back - in
tenets of Pop Art, it nevertheless totally dismissed thatpopular nostalgia at least - to carefree, less complex
movement's later associations with Warholian masstimes in which a sense of place and purpose were
production.clearly defined. It's little wonder that its revival coincides
And in San Francisco, too, similar trends were at work.with acute apprehension regarding our own, turbulent
In the 1990s a group of artists including Chris Johansen,times.
Clare E Rojas and Barry McGee emerged to form aBy contrast, much outsider art is clearly associated
distinctive new scene. Their work, though sharing muchwith not belonging - a characteristic most evident in its
with the Low-Brow phenomenon, differed in severalembrace of art produced by the mentally ill.
important respects and became known as the 'MissionYet here again there's a definite connection. Such
School' in recognition of its essentially San Franciscanwork often originates through its use as a therapeutic
flavor.tool; a fact that throws interesting light on the intricate,
Local influences contributed to a more whimsical,involved delineation of much recent drawing and
looser approach to image-making than LA tendenciespainting. Indeed, in its conspicuous efforts to order,
at the time. Street art such as graffiti formed anpattern and negotiate space, such complexity provides
intrinsic part of the scene, but was generally refinedalmost casebook examples of conflict-solving Gestalt.
into a figurative rather than textual medium. The legacyMore interestingly still, a significant proportion of
of underground comics pioneered by the likes ofcontemporary practice doesn't just seek to interpret
Robert Crumb was also evident in cartoon-likecomplex realities, but actually sets out to create them
characterization and a witty, humorous edge.through construction of highly personal, alternative
More importantly still, while painting lay at the heart ofworlds.
the Low-Brow movement, drawing was much morePaul Noble's well-known drawings of fictional 'Nobson
widely adopted by the Mission School artists.Newtown' are devoid of human figures, yet imbued
In a nod to the hand-drawn agitprop and pyschedeliawith visual invention and idiosyncratic textual comment.
of '60s Haight-Ashbury, they revived techniques suchA clear intention is to provide a reflection of the mind
as detailed patterning, hand-lettering and découpage.of their maker: as Noble himself puts it, "town planning
Materials, too, were frequently unconventional; ball-pointas self-portraiture".
pens, markers, recycled paper, wood or metal all foundOther artists' fictional worlds provide similar arenas for
a part in the Mission School look.grappling with issues that echo or parallel our own.
This 'regional' distinction was clearly underlined inMichael Whittle, a recent graduate from the Royal
publicity for a 2000 show at LA's New Image Gallery:College of Art, creates intricate drawings melding
SAN FRANCISCO DRAWING SHOW curated by:religious iconography with motifs garnered from
Alicia McCarthy and Chris Johanson. May 19 - June 17,heraldry, alchemy and science. The resulting images,
2000.snapshots of impossible states, underpin the artist's
Straight out of San Francisco, drawings of over 15own desire to "make sense of reality" while also
artists will be exhibited .... Currently there are importantinvestigating "... man's attempts to come to terms with
artistic trends developing out of San Francisco.existence".
Drawing is at the root of this development.Camille Rose Garcia (whose practice, though largely
Meanwhile, however, America's East Coast foundidentified with painting, includes much drawing) is well
itself forced (for once) to gradually acknowledge aknown for deceptively enchanting visions of what
nexus of creativity occurring elsewhere. While manyamounts to a near-dystopia. A recurring cast of
commentators, curators and gallerists becamecharacters battle to save or destroy a poisoned, dying
increasingly aware that some kind of real cultural shiftworld. The baddies, unfortunately, seem to be winning.
was taking place, others seemed slow or simplyArt today appears to be grappling with a spiritual,
unwilling to recognize its impact or legitimacy.political and therapeutic function that arguably, it hasn't
Yet the growing appeal of Low-Brow and relatedreflected quite so clearly for centuries. And the fact
work - especially amongst a generation of new andthat drawing, the most immediate and spontaneous of
emerging artists - was undeniable. New galleriesmediums, forms a vital aspect of the interpretation of a
opened to deal exclusively in the genre, and Juxtapoz,complex world should come as no surprise.
along with many of its featured artists, began toPostscript: Drawing right now - who we're liking
acquire a cult following. Its international distribution andThe energy of the California scene continues apace,
the broad reach of the internet helped ensure that thiswith San Francisco still arguably the epicentre of new
new sensibility filtered beyond the US.drawing - check out the wonderful work of Sara
The 'unofficial' Californian scene gathering pace in theThustra, Sacha Eckes, Andrew Schoultz and Simone
'90s was intrinsically linked to a rejection of prevailingShubuck (a San Francisco native, though now resident
artistic practice - the notion, as Fred Tomaselli later putin New York).
it, "...that people are a bit tired of the over-rationalismLA practice remains particularly diverse, but artists
(sic) of the art world, this idea that you can get towho make exciting use of drawing include Travis
everything through the cerebral."Millard, Adam Janes and Gina Triplett.
Yet its ethos was otherwise hugely democratic andElsewhere in the States, we enjoy the work of Carter,
unifying, a statement of validity for neglected orAurel Schmidt and UK-born Dominic McGill (best
side-lined art. There can be little doubt that itsknown for his epic, 65ft 'Project for a New American
emergence provided an impetus behind the currentCentury').
interest in drawing.In Europe, Richard Höglund produces interesting
But this interest - and with it, the resurgence of adrawings informed by semiotics, and in the UK, artists
particular kind of artistic engagement - was not, ofof note include Sarah Woodfine and Adam Dant (the
course, solely confined to America's West Coast.latter have both been recipients of the Jerwood
Elsewhere in the States, Laylah Ali's first major showDrawing Prize.
of meticulously patterned, faux-naif works took placeMost exciting of all, newcomer Laura Oldfield Ford
at Chicago's MOCA in 1999 (she had been featured,creates large-scale, beautifully rendered drawings with
along with Chris Johansen, at New York's Drawingastute political commentary at their core, as well as the
Center in the summer of 1998).cult zine 'Savage Messiah, an extraordinary foray into
Julie Mehretu, likewise emerging towards the end ofthe psycho-geographic terrain of London.